Where the Conflict Really Lies

Where the Conflict Really Lies

Science, Religion, and Naturalism

Book - 2011
Average Rating:
1
Rate this:
This book is a long-awaited major statement by a pre-eminent analytic philosopher, Alvin Plantinga, on one of our biggest debates -- the compatibility of science and religion. The last twenty years has seen a cottage industry of books on this divide, but with little consensus emerging. Plantinga, as a top philosopher but also a proponent of the rationality of religious belief, has a unique contribution to make. His theme in this short book is that the conflict between science and theistic religion is actually superficial, and that at a deeper level they are in concord.

Plantinga examines where this conflict is supposed to exist -- evolution, evolutionary psychology, analysis of scripture, scientific study of religion -- as well as claims by Dan Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Philip Kitcher that evolution and theistic belief cannot co-exist. Plantinga makes a case that their arguments are not only inconclusive but that the supposed conflicts themselves are superficial, due to the methodological naturalism used by science. On the other hand, science can actually offer support to theistic doctrines, and Plantinga uses the notion of biological and cosmological "fine-tuning" in support of this idea. Plantinga argues that we might think about arguments in science and religion in a new way -- as different forms of discourse that try to persuade people to look at questions from a perspective such that they can see that something is true. In this way, there is a deep and massive consonance between theism and the scientific enterprise.
Publisher: New York : Oxford University Press, c2011.
ISBN: 9780199812097
0199812098
Characteristics: xvi, 359 p. ;,22 cm.

Opinion

From the critics


Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment

n
naturalist
May 03, 2017

“Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible”
by Victor Stenger, updated August 27, 2011, at The Blog, HuffPost
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/victor-stenger/why-science-and-religion-_1_b_879022.html
and,
“Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible”
by Lorna Salzman, posted 2002
http://www.lornasalzman.com/collectedwritings/evolution_whyscienceandreligionareincompatible.html
and,
“Science and religion are incompatible in two major ways”
with John Shook, posted June 15, 2009, at It’s Only Natural
http://www.centerforinquiry.net/blogs/entry/science_and_religion_are_incompatible_in_two_major_ways/

Age Suitability

Add Age Suitability

There are no age suitabilities for this title yet.

Summary

Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.

Notices

Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.

Quotes

Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number

Recommendations

Subject Headings

  Loading...

Find it at Library

  Loading...
[]
[]
To Top